January 29, 2008 at 5:54 pm · Filed under Guest Blogger, Television

A media critique by Wayne Friedman from TV Watch , Tuesday, January 29, 2008

CHILDREN SHOULDN’T BE WATCHING RACY TV at 9 p.m. But somehow, at 10 p.m., it’s safe to show a woman’s backside to those same children.

Last week ABC was spanked around by the Federal Communications Commission to the tune of $1.4 million in fines to some 50 ABC affiliates in Mountain and Central time zones who ran an “NYPD Blue” episode at 9 p.m. that showed a women’s backside.

Hopefully children don’t get to see their parents, relatives or parents’ friends mistakenly in a bathroom or coming out of a shower. The ” NYPD Blue” scene was about that. Detective Andy Sipowicz’ girlfriend is about to take a shower, drops her robe, talks to Sipowicz, and then, mistakenly, Sipowicz’ son gets an eyeful of her behind.

Kids running around their parents’ Super Bowl parties also got a brief eyeful, when in February 2004, Janet Jackson’s breast made an unexpected Super Bowl appearance. It was a mistake — her costume wasn’t supposed to come off.

The FCC has a strict 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. rule where indecent programming is not allowed. What about those kids who saw the Jackson breast at 10 p.m. or perhaps at other times — through means of the DVR or, more likely in 2003, a videotape recording?

In this digital age, in this time-shifted, anywhere-anytime world, a time period means nothing. The FCC needs to reinvent the rules. Procedural crime dramas are probably not good programming for eight-year-olds at 10 p.m. or 7 p.m. or 3 p.m. or just after “Sesame Street” at 9 p.m. (in regards to daytime cable reruns).

ABC did offer up parental warnings about the “NYPD Blue” episode. But the FCC said that didn’t matter — the scene was lingering. With no parents around, however, you have a bigger problem. I’d like to know if an 8- or 10-year-old read the warning, and said: “Gee, I better not watch. I’m alone and not sure what this programming is about. And I’m sure the wrong advertisers will be targeting me with all sort of cell phone ads, great deals on cars, or financial services. My allowance is only $10 a week. And, what if something yucky comes on? Eeew!”

Some of those thoughts might have occurred. But with no parents around, who can help answer those questions?

No matter. The FCC is swatting at flies while travelling down the Amazon.

Feel free to comment.

 


Comments

10/26/2010 01:22

I am expecting some different idea from your side. You always represent some new thought in your post.

Reply
10/28/2010 19:22

It is really nice for me to see you and your great hardwork again.Every piece of your work look excellent.Looking forward to hearing more from you!

Reply
11/25/2010 16:52

I always cut out interesting article.

Reply
04/03/2012 08:53

U have a good idea and always share new and intersting information.Thanks for sharing.

Reply
05/25/2012 18:24

Thanks for the great article, what style of fun! He listens to you, it would be great to see that you sent. All projects are gorgeous! Thus, they would have to write this.I, I have to encourage the writing style and his information, I would also like to thank the new baseball hat and easily at any time, please go to the end. I was asked to try to get through the entries in this blog. I post and I hope that this web site with high quality and in the future. Creativity and ask me about my site by now. His blog is really spread its wings, is growing rapidly. Your letter is a good example. I would recommend to continue the good day for you, your contribution is great!

Reply
06/02/2012 02:43

Looking forward to see cool stuff from you guys!

Reply
06/08/2012 00:22

It is very meaningful. Thank you!

Reply
06/28/2012 00:59


What you said made a lot of sense. But, think about this, what if you added a little content? I mean, I dont want to tell you how to run your blog, but what if you added something to maybe get peoples attention? Just like a video or a picture or two to get .To examine this level of your respective duty money back guarantee, visit the RATES websites as a result of seeking out it all throughout google search.

Reply
09/03/2013 22:31

I’ll probably be back again to read more, thanks for the information!

Reply



Leave a Reply


Google Analytics